Thanks for writing this, it clarifies a lot. Your point about 'we are all related' is so insightful. What if, on a larger scale, that intrinsic relateness could avoid clear favoritism in leadership?
My Pleasure, I am so glad you enjoyed it. And your question is exactly on point, relatedness challenges favourtism, (I mean mostly, we are all human, so I know I have people I like more than others) by not tying our value to the job we have.
In part because getting or not getting a role is about the work, not about the relationship since in Indigenous worldview we all matter, we are all wanted, regardless of how productive we are.
Thanks for writing this, it clarifies a lot. Your point about 'we are all related' is so insightful. What if, on a larger scale, that intrinsic relateness could avoid clear favoritism in leadership?
My Pleasure, I am so glad you enjoyed it. And your question is exactly on point, relatedness challenges favourtism, (I mean mostly, we are all human, so I know I have people I like more than others) by not tying our value to the job we have.
In part because getting or not getting a role is about the work, not about the relationship since in Indigenous worldview we all matter, we are all wanted, regardless of how productive we are.
I have an essay I wrote on this foundational distinction if you are interested, I'll link it here. https://mischief.trishamcormond.com/p/does-the-world-find-you-wanted-or